SURVIVAL RD CORRECTION LIST (SRD-CL) - 27 MAY 1980

SURVIVAL RD CORRECTION LIST (SRD-CL) - 27 MAY 1980

Сообщение auditor » 22 сен 2016, 09:49

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MAY 1980
Survival RD
Co-Audit Super-visors
Review Auditors
C/Ses
Survival Rundown Series 15

SURVIVAL RD CORRECTION LIST (SRD-CL)

This is a correction list for errors that may be made during the Survival Rundown. It can be as¬sessed by the Co-Audit Supervisor (if fully qualified to assess and handle this list) or in a ses¬sion by a Review Auditor. It is arranged so that it can be handled in the same sequence as the list, and is usually done Method 3, but in the case of a heavy upset, assess it Method 5. Each reading question is to be taken to an F/N per the instructions. (Any further handling (as given in the list) can then be done, after the reading questions have been F/Ned.)

This list has two main uses:

A. When difficulty is encountered during a co-audit session and the Co-Audit Supervisor needs to get the session rolling again. In this instance the list would be assessed and handled until the cause of the diffi¬culty had been handled and then the co-audit session would be con-tinued. The whole list need not be done, and shouldn’t be continued past the point when the co-audit could resume.

B. When used by a Review Auditor, in which case the whole list would be done to ensure that all pos¬sible sources of bypassed charge were found and handled. (Should someone on the SRD feel unwilling to continue session or the SRD, or actually discontinue, assess this list Method 5 and indicate the largest read. Then handle the remaining reads.)


1. DID YOU GO EXTERIOR?
(If so, find when, and rehab. Do not continue the same process that the person went exterior on as it has EPed.) __________
2. HAVE YOU HAD DIFFICULTY BEING AUDITED AFTER HAVING GONE EXTERIOR?
(Indicate that the person was audited after Exterior. Turn this over to a Re¬view Auditor to handle per Int Series HCOBs.)
__________
3. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT HASN’T T BEEN UNDERSTOOD?
(Find out what, and clarify it. If a misunderstood word, clear it with a Dic¬tionary or the Tech Dictionary, to F/N. Then have the person study the mate¬rial again where the word was en-countered. If it was a command that was misunderstood, clear any MU words and reclear the command. (C/S is then to adjudicate if the process should be taken up.)) __________
4. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT WASN’T ACKNOWLEDGED?
(Find out what it was and acknowledge it. If no F/N, find out if there was an earlier similar time when something wasn’t acknowledged, to F/N.) __________
5. IS THERE AN UPSET WITH SOMEONE?
(Find out what the upset is and who with, and assess it as an ARC Break to F/N or E/S to F/N.) __________
6. IS THERE ANY PRESENT TIME WORRY?
(Find out what it is, and handle it, or 2WC to F/N or E/S to F/N.) __________
7. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU THOUGHT OF THAT YOU DIDN’T TELL YOUR AUDITOR?
(Encourage the person to tell it, using the Prompters from HCOB 10 Dec 64. See Tech Dic-tionary. Handle to F/N.)
__________
8. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU HAVE DONE THAT YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE?
(Pull the overt to F/N or E/S to F/N.)
__________
9. HAS THERE BEEN ANY INVALIDATION?
(Find out what was invalidated, by whom, and how it was invalidated, to F/N or E/S to F/N.) __________
10. HAS THERE BEEN ANY EVALUATION?
(Find out what the evaluation was and by whom, to F/N or E/S to F/N.) __________
11. WERE THE AUDITING COMMANDS FLUBBED?
(2WC to get data, and to get off the person’s reaction to it, to F/N, or E/S to F/N. Correct the auditor with the reference and get the process run correctly.) __________
12. WAS A PROCESS RUN INCORRECTLY?
(Handle as in #11.) __________
13. WAS A PROCESS LEFT UNFLAT?
(Find out which process, and get the process continued to full EP.) __________
14. DID A REACTION TURN ON DURING A PROCESS?
(Find out what process, and indicate that the process is unflat, to F/N, or E/S to F/N. Ensure that the unflat process(es) gets flattened.) __________
15. WAS A PROCESS ENDED WHILE IT WAS STILL PRODUCING CHANGE?
(Find out what process, and indicate that the process is unflat, to F/N, or E/S to F/N. Ensure that the unflat process(es) gets flattened.)
__________
16. WAS A PROCESS „2 WAY COMM’D TO AN F/N“, INSTEAD OF RUNN¬ING THE PROCESS TO EP?
(Indicate that the process is unflat. Get it flattened.)
__________
17. DID YOU GET AN F/N BY TALKING ABOUT THE PROCESS, IN-STEAD OF RUNNING THE PROCESS?
(Indicate that the process is unflat, as the process itself was not run to EP. Get the process flattened.)
__________
18. DID SOMEONE SUGGEST A PROCESS WAS UNNECESSARY OR SHOULDN’T BE RUN?
(2WC to F/N, getting the data. Get the process run, so the pc doesn’t miss the gain available from it.)
__________
19. DO YOU THINK THAT THESE PROCESSES ARE UNNECESSARY?
(Get off the person’s considerations about why he/ she thinks the processes are unnec¬essary, to F/N, or E/S to F/N. If the pc is now ready to continue the SRD let him do so. If not, turn this in to the C/S.) __________
20. ARE YOU PROTESTING ANYTHING?
(Find out what the pc is protesting, to F/N, or E/S to F/N.) __________
21. ARE YOU ASSERTING SOMETHING?
(Find out what the pc is asserting, to F/N, or E/S to F/N.) __________
22. DID YOU HAVE A COGNITION THAT YOU DIDN’T MENTION?
(Get the pc to tell the cognition. If it was the EP for a process indicate that it was. If not the EP, acknowledge the cognition, and have the process contin¬ued. Do not at¬tempt to „2WC the process to F/N“, as the process itself must be run to F/N.) __________
23. WAS A COGNITION NOT ACCEPTED?
(Handle as in #22.) __________
24. WAS A PROCESS CONTINUED AFTER IT WAS FLAT?
(2WC to get the data. If the process was run to EP, rehab it.) __________
25. HAVE YOU ATTESTED OR DECLARED ANY STATE THAT YOU DIDN’T HONESTLY AND FULLY ATTAIN?
(Get off the withhold of the pc having done this, to F/N, or E/S to F/N. If the pc is now willing to continue the SRD, continue it. If not, turn the data in to the C/S.)
__________
26. WERE YOU NOT SURE WHAT TO DO?
(Find out by getting data and take it to F/N, or E/S to F/N. If a process com¬mand, clear the command, and get the process correctly run and flattened.) __________
27. WAS THERE ANY LACK OF UNDERSTANDING?
(2WC to get data and take it to F/N or E/S to F/N. If it was an ARC Break, assess it as an ARC Break.) __________
28. DID SOMEONE GIVE YOU VERBAL DATA?
(2WC to F/N or E/S to F/N. Then handle with the correct reference.) __________
29. DO YOU HAVE MUTUAL OUT RUDS WITH YOUR TWIN?
(Fly mutual Out Rude on both the pc and the twin.) __________
30. HAS THERE BEEN ANY ENTURBULATION ON COURSE?
(2WC to F/N or E/S to F/N.) __________
31. ARE THERE ANY DISAGREEMENTS?
(Get the disagreements of f by 2WC to F/N, or E/S to F/N.) __________
32. HAS THE SAME PROCESS BEEN RUN AGAIN AFTER IT HAD BEEN FLAT¬TENED EARLIER?
(Find out which process and when it was flattened and indicate the overrun. Rehab.)
__________
33. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN UNNECESSARY REVIEWS OR REPAIRS?
(Indicate. Let pc tell you about it. If no F/N, E/S to F/N. Then complete the SRD, or if earlier SRD processes were quickied, flatten them from the earliest on forward.) __________
34. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED ON SUBJECTIVE PROCESSES, BE-FORE THE OBJECTIVES WERE COMPLETE?
(Indicate that this could be an error, as subjective processes are best run after the SRD. Get off pc’s considerations about it, to F/N, or E/S to F/N. Com¬plete the SRD.)
__________
35. WERE THERE ANY OTHER ERRORS IN THE AUDITING?
(2WC to find out what, and get the person’s reaction to these off to F/N, or E/S to F/N.) __________
36. HAS ANYONE INVALIDATED YOUR GAINS OR PROGRESS?
(Find out who and get the invalidation off to F/N, or E/S to F/N. Send to an Ethics Officer for PTS handling.) __________
37. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE WHO IS ANTAGONISTIC TO YOU?
(Find out who, and 2WC for data and take it to F/N. Turn the data over to an Ethics Officer to handle.)
__________
38. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE WHO DOESN’T APPROVE OF YOU DOING THE HQS OR SCIENTOLOGY?
(2WC to get the data and take it to F/N. Turn the data over to an Ethics Offi¬cer to handle.)
__________
39. IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR PURIFICATION RD?
(2WC to get the data and take it to F/N. Turn the data over to a Purification RD C/L to han-dle.) __________
40. HAVE YOU TAKEN DRUGS OR MEDICINE WHILE ON THE HQS?
(2WC to F/N. Also find out why the person took the drugs or medicine, and whether physical-ly ill or other reason. Get the data to the C/S.) __________
41. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY TIRED OR HAD INSUFFICIENT REST?
(2WC to get data. Indicate that one shouldn’t be audited without sufficient rest. Get a han-dling worked out so that the person does get sufficient rest.) __________
42. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED WHILE HUNGRY OR IMPROPERLY FED?
(2WC for data. Get the person to eat if hungry now.)
__________
43. IS THERE ANY UNHANDLED ETHICS SITUATION?
(Get the data, and take it to F/N, or E/S to F/N. Turn the data over to an Eth¬ics Offi¬cer to handle.) __________
44. ARE YOU INVOLVED IN SOMETHING UNETHICAL?
(2WC for data and pull any withhold about it to F/N or e/s to F/N. If ethics handling is need-ed, turn the data over to an Ethics Officer for appropriate handling.) __________
45. WAS THERE REALLY NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE?
(2WC and if there wasn’t, indicate it, to F/N or E/S to F/N.) __________
46. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG, NOT COVERED ON THIS LIST?
(Indicate it. If the person knows what it is have him tell you about it to F/N or E/S to F/N. Otherwise, get a C/S 53 done by a Review Auditor.)
__________


L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

As assisted by Senior C/S Int

LRH:DM:dr
Professional auditing in any place on the planet http://webauditing.org http://0-48.ru http://galac-patra.org Auditor class X, skype: timecops
auditor
 
Сообщений: 669
Зарегистрирован: 28 дек 2015, 12:01

Вернуться в L Ron Hubbard original HCO BULLETINS, POLISIES

Кто сейчас на форуме

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 1